 
Too Little Too Late? |
Posted By Mark Muro,
Friday, August 13, 2010
|
Note: This post is a reprint from The Avenue blog, in collaboration with the Brookings Metropolitan Policy Program, and part of The New Republic web site. In November 2009 we and the National League of Cities (and many others) warned that
steep state and local public sector cuts loomed on the horizon, and
that these cuts could undermine any nascent economic recovery just as
the federal government’s unprecedented stimulus spending wound down.
Well, from the looks of July’s disheartening jobs report, this prognosis is now the new reality.
The economy shed 131,000 jobs on net in July, as a modest
private sector gain of 71,000 jobs was dwarfed by a public sector loss
of 202,000 jobs thanks to the expiration of 143,000 temporary census
positions and the shedding of 48,000 state and local government
workers.And let’s not forget that the official employment numbers
exclude the 181,000 disgruntled job seekers who left the labor force altogether last month.
In view of that, it was welcome if belated good news last week
that the Senate finally bestirred itself to pass a $26.1 billion state
aid package to stem the coming tide of teacher, police, and firefighter
layoffs. That meant that the House could at last seal the deal yesterday
by passing the bill in a characteristically partisan 247-161 vote and
pass it on to President Obama for his signature.
And yet, notwithstanding the modestly good news, a bitter sense
of belatedness--of too-little, too-late--pervades Congress’
long-delayed action.
Not only is the new $26.1 billion deal less than half the size
of the package President Obama originally requested.Even worse,
analysts’ auguries about the future spur only foreboding and fears that a
widening public employment crisis really does have the power to weaken
the nation’s already faltering economic recovery.
For example, if the conclusions of a survey
released in July by the National League of Cities are borne out, then
local governments alone will shed up to 500,000 more workers by the
close of fiscal year 2012--on top of the 300,000 already laid off
between August 2008 and July 2010.Such layoffs could well drag the
troubled economy closer to the dreaded trough of a second recessionary
dip.
How is it that the local government fiscal crisis threatens the
entire economy’s recovery?Essentially because every local or state cut
acts as a stroke of "anti-stimulus” by reducing demand.
To begin with, individuals without a job--even if they receive
unemployment benefits--spend less, and this takes demand directly out of
the economy.And then these layoffs are all accompanied by
across-the-board budget and service cuts.A front-page New York Times article last week
documented how residents are coping with darkened streets and the
shutting of transit systems.But less visibly, local governments have
curtailed investments, reined in subcontracting, and cut back on a whole
host of activities that normally prime the economy but are ultimately
executed by the private sector.These cutbacks suck further demand out
of regional economies and guarantee additional layoffs.In the end, the
Economic Policy Institute estimates that 30 private sector layoffs accompany every 100 public sector ones.
So if the situation is set to worsen (typically the full
effects of a recession on local government tax receipts are felt with a
two to three year lag) and Congress has no appetite for further
stimulus, what politically feasible actions can be taken to defuse the
local government fiscal crisis before it undercuts the recovery?
One interesting idea comes from Ed Glaeser, the Harvard polymath, in a thought-provoking post
over at Economix last month. Glaeser proposed tying additional state
aid to governance reform and stipulations to encourage longer-term
budget discipline, like mandatory saving in good times, to minimize the
moral hazard involved in any bail out--much in the style of
International Monetary Fund conditionality agreements.That would allow
needed aid to flow and minimize job losses now while ensuring that
states and localities better position themselves to weather future
crises.
The problem is Glaeser was not very specific about the proposed conditionality and how it would work. (We’d love suggestions).
In the meantime, nobody should feel much relief this week now that
Congress has responded to the looming state-local government
shakeout.What Congress did was too little, too late.
Tags:
ARRA
jobs
Natinal League of Ciites
Stimulus Program
unemployment
workforce
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
The Human Side of the ARRA |
Posted By Administration,
Friday, July 23, 2010
|
Jack Meyer, PhD., is a Principal
in the Washington, DC office of Health Management Associates. He is also a
Professor in the Schools of Public Policy and Public Health at the University
of Maryland. Dr. Meyer was the founder and President of the Economic and Social
Research Institute. His current research interests include assessments of the
new national health reform legislation and the economic stimulus legislation,
analyzing state and local government reforms to improve the health care
delivery system and cover the uninsured, and identifying promising approaches
to care management for people with chronic illness.
|
Jack Meyer, Ph.D
Principal - Health Management Associates |
 |
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 is
one of the most important public policy initiatives ever attempted by our
federal government. This "economic stimulus package” was designed to help pull
our country out of a precipitous drop in economic activity and a huge loss of
jobs.
ARRA is a complex package, and it is easier to understand it
if we recognize that it has three major components—tax cuts, increased payments
and benefits that flow directly to individuals through various government "entitlement”
programs, and a combination of grants to state and local governments and
contracts with private business enterprises. Most of the attention has been
focused on the grants and contracts, giving short shrift to the impact of the
tax and entitlement program changes.
In my examination of the stimulus program, I have carefully
reviewed the work of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), an economics
advisory group in the Executive Office of the President. CEA is charged with
providing quarterly assessments of the impact of the ARRA.
The CEA stresses that any assessment of ARRA and its impact
on both Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and jobs must consider all the components
of the legislation, and most particularly, the impact on jobs of the tax cuts
and the many different funding streams that go directly to individuals, rather
than to states and localities and private contractors for projects in areas
such as energy, transportation, education, and health care. (The report that I
am preparing for the Collins Center will detail four types of investments
designed to improve Florida’s health care system, and I will comment on the
impact of these initiatives later).
According to CEA, well over 20 million people nationwide
have benefitted from the ARRA unemployment benefits to date; many others
benefited from ARRA subsidies covering 65% of their health insurance premiums under
COBRA. In addition, a substantial number
of lower-income people are benefitting from assistance with purchasing food at
the grocery store. Other Americans have
benefited through the Emergency Contingency Fund for Temporary Assistance for
Needy Families (TANF), and the one-time payment under ARRA to retirees,
disabled individuals, and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) recipients, among
others.
I stress these entitlement programs in part because they
account for so much of the ARRA funding, and also because they are targeted
to our neediest citizens. Since the Collins Center is interested in the
question of not just how much is spent, but also who benefits, and to what
extent the stimulus program is helping lower-income and high-need people, I emphasize
this part of ARRA even though it is harder to measure the job impact precisely.
Yet, if unemployed Florida residents receive extended
Unemployment Insurance, replacing about half of their prior earnings, or get
food assistance from ARRA, these citizens, having so little discretionary
income, are going to spend most or all of that money, and there is clear evidence
that this has a "multiplier effect” on jobs.
The US Department of Treasury estimates that over 100
million Americans benefitted from the federal income tax cuts under ARRA. They
saw an almost immediate increase in their paychecks last year as their
withholding was adjusted to reflect the lower taxes.
Also, we cannot forget the First-Time Homebuyer Credit and
the American Opportunity education tax credit, both of which are part of
ARRA. As new home sales picked up somewhat
after their sharp decline, this helped not only the families buying these
homes, but also construction workers and people hired in all of the industries
that supply the housing sector.
The public should understand that ARRA has many different
impacts. Most parts of ARRA are not controversial politically and enjoy
widespread support, and they account for the majority of the funding flows and
jobs. The more controversial issues involve the direct contracting and spending
parts (e.g. weatherizing homes, light rail, housing project improvements, clean
water initiatives, etc). Some critics of ARRA may think of these as
"boondoggles” or better left up to the private sector. I won’t get into that
here, but the point is that people should understand that there is much more to
ARRA and how it affects their lives than these spending projects, as important
as they are.
Tags:
ARRA
healthcare
Stimulus Program
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
Building pathways to Healthy Communities through Transparency in Public Spending |
Posted By Administration,
Monday, June 21, 2010
|
Leda M. Perez, Ph.D is the Vice President of Health Initiatives at the Collins Center for Public Policy where she leads efforts to improve decision-making on state and national public policies relating to health.
|
Leda Perez, Ph.D
Vice President of Health Initiatives |
 |
Decisions that impact on the well being of communities begin with public budgets; with a determination for how public resources will be allocated and spent. Public knowledge of how these decisions are made is a necessary component for understanding the rationale behind why funds have been distributed in certain ways, while providing the platform for questioning and/or supporting these decisions and/or offering more efficient alternatives. Because funds are not always allocated in the ways that most reflect a community´s needs, working with transparency as a tool for improving clarity for both decision makers and the public alike may be critical toward helping to make equitable and effective public policy decisions.
What is transparency? It may mean different things to different people in different circumstances, but seen as a tool meant to improve public policy decision-making, transparency is that which enables the availability, accessibility, and clarity of public resources data. Is transparency alone sufficient? No, it is not. Transparency is one piece of the puzzle, but alone it does guarantee that data will be understandable. Thus, the essential corollary to transparency in public spending may include a commitment on behalf of those posting information – those both in the public as well as private sector -- to disaggregate data so that it is more easily understandable. At the same time, a citizen-based commitment to follow the data, to understand how funds are spent, is an important part of the equation. This requires seeking out of spaces – both physical and virtual – through which to study the issues, ask questions, but also share information as to what is happening "on the ground” in order to better inform policy decisions.
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) stimulus funds offers people the opportunity to follow government stimulus spending, but to also share personal and community-based testimonies of what is working and what is not working. As the largest public investment in United States history, at a time in which the country has experienced the worst economic crisis of the past near century, it would seem that there is both a challenge and an opportunity for the public and private sectors alike to follow carefully how government decision-making is occurring with regards to the allocation and expenditure of these funds. The challenge continues to be the onerous nature of interpreting the data that is available. The opportunity is for everyone from the average person, to the researcher, to the activist to the public policy decision-maker to ask questions of the data and to insist on better answers.
Public policy that best meets the interests of the constituents it serves must be equally informed from both the policy makers at the decision-making tables as well as the people whose lives these decisions affect. Promoting transparency in public budgets and public engagement in the same may be one key pathway toward achieving this end.
Tags:
ARRA
citizen engagement
data
open government
public policy
Stimulus
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
Build a Fair Florida initiative to highlight impact of stimulus spending on Florida minorities |
Posted By Administration,
Monday, June 07, 2010
|
Build a Fair Recovery is a campaign under the Build a Fair Florida initiative convened by the Miami Workers Center and Florida New Majority that seeks to highlight the impact of federal economic stimulus spending on Black and Latino communities in Florida, and to influence policy makers to use public funding to make targeted investments in hard-hit communities of color.
"Where is the stimulus?"
We have been talking to people about the stimulus ever since we started studying its impact on communities last year, and there is a lot of confusion over where the stimulus has gone. Some people confuse "the stimulus” with "the bailout.” Others simply have not seen many signs of spending in their neighborhoods, or are worried that unemployment remains high.
Much of the confusion comes from the ARRA itself, which was a compromise between competing ideas about how to fix the economy. Some conservatives objected to any kind of stimulus, and others argued that tax cuts were the best way to stimulate the economy. More centrist economists argued that when the private sector is unwilling or unable to spend, government must step in to stop the downward spiral of falling demand and job loss. Progressives wanted to use the stimulus to address long term priorities like infrastructure and building a green economy.
The ARRA reflects this compromise. A $400 tax credit for working individuals and extended unemployment benefits put money in people's pockets. Hundreds of thousands of education jobs were retained through infusions into state budgets. Infrastructure and clean energy projects have created over 2,000 jobs in Florida.
The bill included strict timelines for getting the money out into the economy order to stop the freefall of demand and job loss as soon as possible. In this sense, the stimulus has done its job: GDP has been increasing since late 2009, and job loss has been slowing.
But given the small emphasis on actual job creationprograms in the ARRA to begin with, it's no surprise that people are now asking where the jobs are. In particular, minority communities are asking this question, and there are troubling signs that due to the emphasis on "shovel ready” projects, minority communities have not benefitted equally, as our report Beyond the Quick Fix has shown.
One of the best things that ARRA has done is provide seed money to communities to design innovative programs that bring together public programs and private industry to create jobs. Portland and Kansas City for example have used stimulus dollars to provide revolving loans for financing retrofits of homes to be more energy efficient, while assuring that the jobs created are good paying jobs with benefits and that training opportunities are included to bring minority workers into higher paying occupations.
We need this kind of innovation in every sector, and we need it in Florida. Imagine, how many architecture and manufacturing jobs would there be if we made every home and building energy efficient? How many engineering and construction jobs would there be if we repaired every road and bridge? How many teaching jobs would there be if every child sat in a classroom of ten students? How many nursing jobs would there be if every patient had a nurse? The truth is there are plenty of jobs waiting to be created. We just need the will and the creativity to do it.
Emily Eisenhauer
Tags:
ARRA
economy
federal
FIU
florida
latino
miami
minorities
Stimulus
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
How is ARRA impacting health spending? |
Posted By Administration,
Thursday, May 20, 2010
|
Leda M. Perez, Ph.D is the Vice President of Health Initiatives at the Collins Center for Public Policy where she leads efforts to improve decision-making on state and national public policies relating to health.
|
Leda Perez, Ph.D
Vice President of Health Initiatives |
 |
ARRA funding heavily emphasizes three categories of spending: health, education and infrastructure – all areas in which jobs can be preserved or created and social spending can be maintained and/or enhanced. As part of the Collins Center's regular series of reports, we are working with Jack Meyer, Ph.D., of Washington, DC-based Health Management Associates to produce a first report on ARRA health spending in the state of Florida.
What do we know right now? Early indications are that the Federal Medical Assistance Percentages (FMAP) has increased from about 55% to about 67%, accounting for more than $4.3 billion, a significant portion of the Florida budget. To the degree that it is possible, we will be looking at positive things derived from this investment (e.g., improved health care access and/or jobs created and/or saved) as well as negative things (e.g., diminished health care access and/or jobs created and/or saved) avoided as a result of the enhanced FMAP. Keep your eye on possible imminent Congressional action to extend this higher FMAP for six additional months next year.
Though funding has been substantially less for health information technology (HIT), we will also be looking at what new things have happened as a result, including subsidies to providers to adopt and implement electronic health records (EHRs), investing in new efforts, or building up existing ones, as well as efforts made via regional health information organizations (RHIOs).
Finally, we will be exploring how funds awarded to Florida from Health and Human Services (HHS) have been spent. Who is benefiting from these expenditures and how?
Has health spending via ARRA positively affected the needs of those most in need in Florida? We hope to know soon. In the meantime, follow our online community and post your own thoughts as we continue to provide regular updates.
Tags:
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
ARRA
Florida
healthcare
medicine
Stimulus
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
 
Thoughts on Florida's implementation of the ARRA |
Posted By Administration,
Friday, May 07, 2010
|
A note from the Collins Center:
It is our pleasure to introduce this new Blog with its first post written by Don Winstead, special advisor to Governor Charlie Crist. Mr. Winstead directs the Florida Office of Economic Recovery and oversees the implementation of the federal recovery act in Florida.
|
Don Winstead
Special Advisor to Governor Charlie Crist |
 |
It is a great pleasure to share some thoughts on Florida's implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act as the Collins Center adds to the public discourse about the stimulus package. In March 2009 when Governor Crist gave his State of the State address, we estimated that Florida would receive $12 billion from the federal stimulus bill. Now, our latest estimate is just under $20 billion. The stimulus has helped stabilize state and local budgets while making important investments in education, transportation and energy. Many families impacted by the economic downturn have received help that has lessened the impact of their children and their future. Florida has met every federal deadline and emerged as a leader in fiscal accountability and reporting on Recovery Act expenditures.
Some key impacts:
- Florida's schools are receiving almost $4 billion to stabilize education budgets and avoid teacher layoffs.
- Well over 20,000 teachers and other instructional staff like math tutors and reading coaches have kept their jobs due to stimulus funds.
- The Florida legislature wisely spread the education funding over two full school years to provide greater stability for local school districts, colleges and universities.
- Over 600 transportation projects have been funded with stimulus dollars. These include over $1.3 billion in highway funds with additional funds for local transit systems.
- Florida will get $1.25 billion for high-speed rail, with the prospect of more funds to come.
- Energy funds will top $350 million. Some funds will go to help make the homes of low-income families more energy efficient. Other funds will go for rebate programs and projects to promote more efficient use of energy and develop new energy capacity.
- Stimulus funds have provided extended unemployment compensation for people who have lost their jobs and increased nutrition assistance for thousands of low-income Floridians.
- The Council of Economic Advisors estimated in early 2009 that the Recovery Act would create or save 206,000 jobs in Florida. Through the March 2010 quarter, they estimate the cumulative job impact in Florida to be 153,000 jobs – well ahead of the initial target.
It' s an impressive list – and just the beginning. Overall, stimulus funds have gone to 22 state agencies with additional grants and contracts going directly from federal agencies to cities, counties and other local agencies as well as private contractors. Florida's universities have successfully competed for research grants and work has begun on new innovations in health care including health information technology.
In the future we expect more federal awards for broadband technology and development of electronic medical records. These strategic investments will pay off for years to come as we move toward a new economy.
As the Governor's Special Advisor it has been a great experience for me to witness first-hand the tremendous efforts of state agencies and our local community partners to stabilize our economy and begin putting Floridians back to work. Now we are seeing some positive signs, both nationally and in our state, but there is much work still to do. I hope you will join the dialog and be part of the effort as we work together to build a new Florida.
Tags:
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
ARRA
economy
Florida
government
Stimulus
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|